Should you care about Wikipedia? What are some of Wikipedia's major problems? What can WhiteHatWiki do to help? Find some
Is your proposed topic “notable”, as defined by Wikipedia? Can something be done to deal with attacks inserted into an article? Have your attempts to update your article been reverted as “promotional”? We’ll assess your issues, do a a review of the relevant sourcing and any existing articles, and advise you if we can be of service. We only take clients we know we can help. If we can’t help you, we’ll explain why and will let you know what you might need to do in the future to increase your chances.
Once we’ve started working with you, we’ll intensely research the topic and create a top-tier encyclopedia article, re-draft or update. You’ll have time to review the draft article for accuracy and inclusiveness. In some cases, a background memo for independent reviewers will also be required. We’ll also advise you on issues such as the best timing and sequence of submissions and the best channels to seek an independent review of changes. Finally, we provide 24×7 monitoring to protect against vandalism, libel and violations of Wikipedia policies.
WhiteHatWiki specializes in “white hat” ethical Wikipedia strategy and problem solving, offering the highest possible level of writing and research, while strictly abiding by official Wikipedia policies, including full disclosure that we are paid consultants and independent review of all our work.
We not only avoid all “black hat” tactics banned by Wikipedia, we go above and beyond by using the real names and credentials of our experts on Wikipedia.
Our full disclosure policy means that unlike most other Wikipedia consultants, we always publicly put our reputation on the line.
We’ve helped corporations, brands, executives, post-funded start ups, and executives with article on a wide range of topics, including on technical subjects ranging from artificial intelligence to cyber attacks. We often manage to get articles approved on topics that were previously rejected or deleted.
An extensive consultation with the client is followed by intensive background research by seasoned Wikipedia experts with impressive real-world backgrounds as academics, lawyers, journalists and executives .Encyclopedia-quality articles and/or re-drafts or updates are produced in strict accordance with Wikipedia policies, such as neutrality, with the opportunity for several rounds of revisions.
All articles and updates are submitted for independent review by unaffiliated Wikipedia editors. Follow article and update through the review and approval process. We strictly abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines throughout, including full public disclosure of our expert services using the real names and credentials of our experts. This bullet-proofs you from challenges or scandals about undisclosed editing.
Beware of Wikipedia consultants who do fully public disclosure that they are paid consultants on the “Talk” page of articles and on their personal Wikipedia profiles – it makes their job much easier, but puts you and the article at significant risk of deletion, reversal of changes, or embarrassment in the press. It may also violate FCC regulations in the United States and the laws of other countries.
We unsuccessfully tried to get our brand into Wikipedia ourselves. WhiteHatWiki not only got an article published, they wrote an interesting entry that does an excellent job explaining the difficult concepts underlying our artificial intelligence business. They took the time to research everything that’s been written about the company and it really showed in the article and its extensive sourcing. I really recommend WhiteHatWiki.